I asked a more data-science-oriented followup prompt to test Opus 4.5’s skill at data-sciencing:
志愿者的无偿服务，对医院来说，是实实在在的“成本利器”。虽然具体财务数据未公开，但我们可以通过服务时间，大致算出它的价值：
，这一点在im钱包官方下载中也有详细论述
保存最为完好的是东院。最出彩的是它的门楼，西方哥特式门顶和中国传统的砖雕结合，使其芳华难掩。门匾上书“平为福”，两侧影壁砖雕富贵牡丹花开。院内主宅正房是2层砖碹窑洞，门楣高处挂有“自省堂”阴刻石匾。西厢房主门留有石刻对联一副：“文成蕉叶书犹绿，吟到梅花句亦香”。东厢房主门留有石刻对联一副：“水色凝蓝辉宇栋，山光摇翠上楼台”。，推荐阅读51吃瓜获取更多信息
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.，更多细节参见夫子
Instead, the first ATMs were token-based. Much like an NYC commuter of the era